skill
Systematic Debugging
نبذة
# Systematic Debugging
## Overview
**Core principle:** ALWAYS find root cause before attempting fixes. Symptom fixes are failure.
**Violating the letter of this process is violating the spirit of debugging.**
## The Iron Law
``` NO FIXES WITHOUT ROOT CAUSE INVESTIGATION FIRST ```
If you haven't completed Phase 1, you cannot propose fixes.
## When to Use
Use for ANY technical issue: - Test failures - Bugs in production - Unexpected behavior - Performance problems - Build failures - Integration issues
**Use this ESPECIALLY when:** - Under time pressure (emergencies make guessing tempting) - "Just one quick fix" seems obvious - You've already tried multiple fixes - Previous fix didn't work - You don't fully understand the issue
**Don't skip when:** - Issue seems simple (simple bugs have root causes too) - You're in a hurry (rushing guarantees rework) - Manager wants it fixed NOW (systematic is faster than thrashing)
## The Four Phases
You MUST complete each phase before proceeding to the next.
### Phase 1: Root Cause Investigation
**BEFORE attempting ANY fix:**
1. **Read Error Messages Carefully** - Don't skip past errors or warnings - They often contain the exact solution - Read stack traces completely - Note line numbers, file paths, error codes
2. **Reproduce Consistently** - Can you trigger it reliably? - What are the exact steps? - Does it happen every time? - If not reproducible → gather more data, don't guess
3. **Check Recent Changes** - What changed that could cause this? - Git diff, recent commits - New dependencies, config changes - Environmental differences
4. **Gather Evidence in Multi-Component Systems**
**WHEN system has multiple components (CI → build → signing, API → service → database):**
**BEFORE proposing fixes, add diagnostic instrumentation:** ``` For EACH component boundary: - Log what data enters component - Log what data exits component - Verify environment/config propagation - Check state at each layer
Run once to gather evidence showing WHERE it breaks THEN analyze evidence to identify failing component THEN investigate that specific component ```
**Example (multi-layer system):** ```bash # Layer 1: Workflow echo "=== Secrets available in workflow: ===" echo "IDENTITY: ${IDENTITY:+SET}${IDENTITY:-UNSET}"
# Layer 2: Build script echo "=== Env vars in build script: ===" env | grep IDENTITY || echo "IDENTITY not in environment"
# Layer 3: Signing script echo "=== Keychain state: ===" security list-keychains security find-identity -v
# Layer 4: Actual signing codesign --sign "$IDENTITY" --verbose=4 "$APP" ```
**This reveals:** Which layer fails (secrets → workflow ✓, workflow → build ✗)
5. **Trace Data Flow**
**WHEN error is deep in call stack:**
See `root-cause-tracing.md` in this directory for the complete backward tracing technique.
**Quick version:** - Where does bad value originate? - What called this with bad value? - Keep tracing up until you find the source - Fix at source, not at symptom
### Phase 2: Pattern Analysis
**Find the pattern before fixing:**
1. **Find Working Examples** - Locate similar working code in same codebase - What works that's similar to what's broken?
2. **Compare Against References** - If implementing pattern, read reference implementation COMPLETELY - Don't skim - read every line - Understand the pattern fully before applying
3. **Identify Differences** - What's different between working and broken? - List every difference, however small - Don't assume "that can't matter"
4. **Understand Dependencies** - What other components does this need? - What settings, config, environment? - What assumptions does it make?
### Phase 3: Hypothesis and Testing
**Scientific method:**
1. **Form Single Hypothesis** - State clearly: "I think X is the root cause because Y" - Write it down - Be specific, not vague
2. **Test Minimally** - Make the SMALLEST possible change to test hypothesis - One variable at a time - Don't fix multiple things at once
3. **Verify Before Continuing** - Did it work? Yes → Phase 4 - Didn't work? Form NEW hypothesis - DON'T add more fixes on top
4. **When You Don't Know** - Say "I don't understand X" - Don't pretend to know - Ask for help - Research more
### Phase 4: Implementation
**Fix the root cause, not the symptom:**
1. **Create Failing Test Case** - Simplest possible reproduction - Automated test if possible - One-off test script if no framework - MUST have before fixing - Use the `superpowers:test-driven-development` skill for writing proper failing tests
2. **Implement Single Fix** - Address the root cause identified - ONE change at a time - No "while I'm here" improvements - No bundled refactoring
3. **Verify Fix** - Test passes now? - No othe
التثبيت
شغل هذا الأمر
npx skills add obra/superpowersيعمل مع
خطوات التثبيت
Install with `npx skills add obra/superpowers`, or clone the repository and copy the `skills/systematic-debugging` folder into your Claude skills directory.
أسئلة شائعة
كيف أثبت Systematic Debugging؟
شغل هذا الأمر في الطرفية:
npx skills add obra/superpowersمع أي أدوات ذكاء اصطناعي تعمل Systematic Debugging؟
تعمل مع claude_app، claude_code، claude_api، cursor، codex، windsurf، cline، zed.
من طور Systematic Debugging؟
طورها obra.
هل Systematic Debugging مجانية؟
نعم، يمكنك استخدامها مجانا.
git clone https://github.com/anthropics/skills && cp -r skills/skills/claude-api ~/.claude/skills/
npx skills add mattpocock/skills
npx skills add mattpocock/skills
npx skills add mattpocock/skills
npx skills add mattpocock/skills
npx skills add microsoft/azure-skills
افحص قبل التثبيت
شغل أي مصدر عبر فحوصاتنا - الظهور في الذكاء الاصطناعي والأمان والأداء واكتشاف التقنيات.
فحص أمني تلقائي للموقع
الأمان
محلل سرعة الصفحة
الأداء
اختبار جودة المحتوى العربي بالذكاء الاصطناعي
جودة المحتوى
مختبر وكلاء الذكاء الاصطناعي
اختبار الذكاء الاصطناعي
كاشف منصة الموقع
الترحيل
تدقيق الظهور في محركات الذكاء الاصطناعي
الظهور في الذكاء الاصطناعي
مولد ملف llms.txt
الظهور في الذكاء الاصطناعي
مقياس سهولة القراءة بالعربية
جودة المحتوى
منشئ البيانات المنظمة
الظهور في الذكاء الاصطناعي
حاسبة تكاليف الذكاء الاصطناعي
اختبار الذكاء الاصطناعي
محلل العناوين العربية
جودة المحتوى