skill

Diagnosing Bugs

mattpocock678,622+ تثبيتموثوق

نبذة

# Diagnosing Bugs

A discipline for hard bugs. Skip phases only when explicitly justified.

When exploring the codebase, read `CONTEXT.md` (if it exists) to get a clear mental model of the relevant modules, and check ADRs in the area you're touching.

## Redact

This skill has you show commands, outputs and captured artifacts. **Redact every secret first**: write `<REDACTED>` in its place. Build loops against env vars, so the credential stays in the environment rather than in what you show. Captured artifacts carry auth headers: quote only the lines that carry the signal.

If the redacted output is not enough to diagnose the bug, say so and ask the user.

## Phase 1: Build a feedback loop

**This is the skill.** Everything else is mechanical. If you have a **tight** pass/fail signal for the bug (one that goes red on _this_ bug), you will find the cause; bisection, hypothesis-testing, and instrumentation all just consume it. If you don't have one, no amount of staring at code will save you.

Spend disproportionate effort here. **Be aggressive. Be creative. Refuse to give up.**

### Ways to construct one, in roughly this order

1. **Failing test** at whatever seam reaches the bug: unit, integration, e2e. 2. **Curl / HTTP script** against a running dev server. 3. **CLI invocation** with a fixture input, diffing stdout against a known-good snapshot. 4. **Headless browser script** (Playwright / Puppeteer) that drives the UI and asserts on DOM/console/network. 5. **Replay a captured trace.** Save a real network request / payload / event log to disk; replay it through the code path in isolation. 6. **Throwaway harness.** Spin up a minimal subset of the system (one service, mocked deps) that exercises the bug code path with a single function call. 7. **Property / fuzz loop.** If the bug is "sometimes wrong output", run 1000 random inputs and look for the failure mode. 8. **Bisection harness.** If the bug appeared between two known states (commit, dataset, version), automate "boot at state X, check, repeat" so you can `git bisect run` it. 9. **Differential loop.** Run the same input through old-version vs new-version (or two configs) and diff outputs. 10. **HITL bash script.** Last resort. If a human must click, drive _them_ with `scripts/hitl-loop.template.sh` so the loop is still structured. Captured output feeds back to you.

Build the right feedback loop, and the bug is 90% fixed.

### Tighten the loop

Treat the loop as a product. Once you have _a_ loop, **tighten** it:

- Can I make it faster? (Cache setup, skip unrelated init, narrow the test scope.) - Can I make the signal sharper? (Assert on the specific symptom, not "didn't crash".) - Can I make it more deterministic? (Pin time, seed RNG, isolate filesystem, freeze network.)

A 30-second flaky loop is barely better than no loop; a 2-second deterministic one is tight, a debugging superpower.

### Non-deterministic bugs

The goal is not a clean repro but a **higher reproduction rate**. Loop the trigger 100×, parallelise, add stress, narrow timing windows, inject sleeps. A 50%-flake bug is debuggable; 1% is not, so keep raising the rate until it's debuggable.

### When you genuinely cannot build a loop

Stop and say so explicitly. List what you tried. Ask the user for: (a) access to whatever environment reproduces it, (b) a redacted captured artifact (HAR file, log dump, core dump, screen recording with timestamps), or (c) permission to add temporary production instrumentation. Do **not** proceed to hypothesise without a loop.

### Completion criterion: a tight loop that goes red

Phase 1 is done when the loop is **tight** and **red-capable**: you can name **one command** (a script path, a test invocation, a curl) that you have **already run at least once** (show the invocation and its output, redacted), and that is:

- [ ] **Red-capable**: it drives the actual bug code path and asserts the **user's exact symptom**, so it can go red on this bug and green once fixed. Not "runs without erroring"; it must be able to _catch this specific bug_. - [ ] **Deterministic**: same verdict every run (flaky bugs: a pinned, high reproduction rate, per above). - [ ] **Fast**: seconds, not minutes. - [ ] **Agent-runnable**: you can run it unattended; a human in the loop only via `scripts/hitl-loop.template.sh`.

If you catch yourself reading code to build a theory before this command exists, **stop: jumping straight to a hypothesis is the exact failure this skill prevents.** No red-capable command, no Phase 2.

## Phase 2: Reproduce + minimise

Run the loop. Watch it go red as the bug appears.

Confirm:

- [ ] The loop produces the failure mode the **user** described, not a different failure that happens to be nearby. Wrong bug = wrong fix. - [ ] The failure is reproducible across multiple runs (or, for non-deterministic bugs, reproducible at a high enough rate to debug against). - [ ] You have captured the exact symptom (error message, wrong output, slow timing) so later ph

التثبيت

شغل هذا الأمر

npx skills add mattpocock/skills

يعمل مع

claude appclaude codeclaude apicursorcodexwindsurfclinezed

خطوات التثبيت

Install with `npx skills add mattpocock/skills`, or clone the repository and copy the `skills/engineering/diagnosing-bugs` folder into your Claude skills directory.

عرض المصدر

أسئلة شائعة

كيف أثبت Diagnosing Bugs؟

شغل هذا الأمر في الطرفية:

npx skills add mattpocock/skills
مع أي أدوات ذكاء اصطناعي تعمل Diagnosing Bugs؟

تعمل مع claude_app، claude_code، claude_api، cursor، codex، windsurf، cline، zed.

من طور Diagnosing Bugs؟

طورها mattpocock.

هل Diagnosing Bugs مجانية؟

نعم، يمكنك استخدامها مجانا.

أصول ذات صلة

مختارات أخرى في التطوير والبرمجة.

كل بدائل Diagnosing Bugs ←
skillclaude_appclaude_codeclaude_api
git clone https://github.com/anthropics/skills && cp -r skills/skills/claude-api ~/.claude/skills/
Claude API
بناء وتصحيح وتحسين تطبيقات Claude API وAnthropologic SDK. يجب أن تتضمن التطبيقات المبنية بهذه المهارة تخزين الأوامر مؤقتا (prompt caching). كما يتعامل…★ 4.8 · 2,500+
skillclaude_appclaude_codeclaude_api
npx skills add mattpocock/skills
Tdd
Test-driven development. Use when the user wants to build features or fix bugs test-first, mentions "red-green-refactor", or wants integration tests.980,434+
skillclaude_appclaude_codeclaude_api
npx skills add mattpocock/skills
Grilling
Grill the user relentlessly about a plan, decision, or idea. Use when the user wants to stress-test their thinking, or uses any 'grill' trigger phrase…793,522+
skillclaude_appclaude_codeclaude_api
npx skills add mattpocock/skills
Code Review
Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes: Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented cod…631,767+
skillclaude_appclaude_codeclaude_api
npx skills add microsoft/azure-skills
Azure Diagnostics
Debug Azure production issues on Azure using AppLens, Azure Monitor, resource health, and safe triage. WHEN: debug production issues, troubleshoot app…608,568+
skillclaude_appclaude_codeclaude_api
npx skills add microsoft/azure-skills
Azure Prepare
Prepare azd-based Azure projects for deployment: generates azure.yaml, infrastructure (Bicep/Terraform), and Dockerfiles for the Azure Developer CLI (…608,154+

افحص قبل التثبيت

شغل أي مصدر عبر فحوصاتنا - الظهور في الذكاء الاصطناعي والأمان والأداء واكتشاف التقنيات.

المزيد في التطوير والبرمجة