skill

To Tickets

mattpocock566,538+ تثبيتموثوق

نبذة

# To Tickets

Break a plan, spec, or conversation into a set of **tickets**: tracer-bullet vertical slices, each declaring the tickets that **block** it.

The issue tracker and triage label vocabulary should have been provided to you. If not, tell the user to run `/setup-matt-pocock-skills`.

## Process

### 1. Gather context

Work from whatever is already in the conversation context. If the user passes a reference (a spec path, an issue number or URL) as an argument, fetch it and read its full body and comments.

### 2. Explore the codebase (optional)

If you have not already explored the codebase, do so to understand the current state of the code. Ticket titles and descriptions should use the project's domain glossary vocabulary, and respect ADRs in the area you're touching.

Look for opportunities to prefactor the code to make the implementation easier. "Make the change easy, then make the easy change."

### 3. Draft vertical slices

Break the work into **tracer bullet** tickets.

<vertical-slice-rules>

- Each slice cuts a narrow but COMPLETE path through every layer (schema, API, UI, tests): vertical, NOT a horizontal slice of one layer - A completed slice is demoable or verifiable on its own - Each slice is sized to fit in a single fresh context window - Any prefactoring should be done first

</vertical-slice-rules>

Give each ticket its **blocking edges**: the other tickets that must complete before it can start. A ticket with no blockers can start immediately.

**Wide refactors are the exception to vertical slicing.** A **wide refactor** is one mechanical change (rename a column, retype a shared symbol) whose **blast radius** fans across the whole codebase, so a single edit breaks thousands of call sites at once and no vertical slice can land green. Don't force it into a tracer bullet; sequence it as **expand–contract**. First expand: add the new form beside the old so nothing breaks. Then migrate the call sites over in batches sized by blast radius (per package, per directory), each batch its own ticket blocked by the expand, keeping CI green batch to batch because the old form still exists. Finally contract: delete the old form once no caller remains, in a ticket blocked by every migrate batch. When even the batches can't stay green alone, keep the sequence but let them share an integration branch that all block a final integrate-and-verify ticket; green is promised only there.

### 4. Quiz the user

Present the proposed breakdown as a numbered list. For each ticket, show:

- **Title**: short descriptive name - **Blocked by**: which other tickets (if any) must complete first - **What it delivers**: the end-to-end behaviour this ticket makes work

Ask the user:

- Does the granularity feel right? (too coarse / too fine) - Are the blocking edges correct: does each ticket only depend on tickets that genuinely gate it? - Should any tickets be merged or split further?

Iterate until the user approves the breakdown.

### 5. Publish the tickets to the configured tracker

Publish the approved tickets. **How** depends on the tracker `/setup-matt-pocock-skills` configured; the tickets are the same either way, only the shape of the blocking edges changes:

- **Local files** → write one file per ticket under `.scratch/<feature-slug>/issues/<NN>-<slug>.md`, numbered from `01` in dependency order (blockers first). Each file's "Blocked by" lists the numbers/titles it depends on. Use the per-ticket file template below: one ticket per file, never a single combined file. - **A real issue tracker (GitHub, Linear, …)** → publish one issue per ticket in dependency order (blockers first) so each ticket's blocking edges can reference real identifiers. Use the platform's native blocking / sub-issue relationship where it has one; otherwise set each ticket's "Blocked by" to the blocking issues. Apply the `ready-for-agent` triage label unless instructed otherwise; the tickets are agent-grabbable by construction.

Work the **frontier**: any ticket whose blockers are all done. For a purely linear chain that means top to bottom.

Do NOT close or modify any parent issue.

<local-ticket-template>

# <NN>: <Ticket title>

**What to build:** the end-to-end behaviour this ticket makes work, from the user's perspective, not a layer-by-layer implementation list.

**Blocked by:** the numbers/titles of the tickets that gate this one, or "None (can start immediately)".

**Status:** ready-for-agent

- [ ] Acceptance criterion 1 - [ ] Acceptance criterion 2

</local-ticket-template>

<issue-template>

## Parent

A reference to the parent issue on the tracker (if the source was an existing issue, otherwise omit this section).

## What to build

The end-to-end behaviour this ticket makes work, from the user's perspective, not layer-by-layer implementation.

## Acceptance criteria

- [ ] Criterion 1 - [ ] Criterion 2

## Blocked by

- A reference to each blocking ticket, or "None (can start immediately)".

</issue-template>

In either form,

التثبيت

شغل هذا الأمر

npx skills add mattpocock/skills

يعمل مع

claude appclaude codeclaude apicursorcodexwindsurfclinezed

خطوات التثبيت

Install with `npx skills add mattpocock/skills`, or clone the repository and copy the `skills/engineering/to-tickets` folder into your Claude skills directory.

عرض المصدر

أسئلة شائعة

كيف أثبت To Tickets؟

شغل هذا الأمر في الطرفية:

npx skills add mattpocock/skills
مع أي أدوات ذكاء اصطناعي تعمل To Tickets؟

تعمل مع claude_app، claude_code، claude_api، cursor، codex، windsurf، cline، zed.

من طور To Tickets؟

طورها mattpocock.

هل To Tickets مجانية؟

نعم، يمكنك استخدامها مجانا.

أصول ذات صلة

مختارات أخرى في خدمة العملاء.

كل بدائل To Tickets ←
skillclaude_appclaude_codeclaude_api
npx skills add microsoft/azure-skills
Azure App Onboard Prereq
Assess whether source code is ready to deploy to Azure — the check BEFORE infrastructure work. Evaluates build health, app completeness, dependencies…124,065+
skillclaude_appclaude_codeclaude_api
git clone https://github.com/microsoft/azure-skills && cp -r azure-skills/skills/azure-app-onboard-prereq ~/.claude/skills/
متطلبات إعداد تطبيق Azure المسبقة
تقييم مدى جاهزية الكود المصدري للنشر على Azure — الفحص الذي يسبق أعمال البنية التحتية. يقوم بتقييم سلامة البناء، واكتمال التطبيق، والتبعيات والخدمات ا…0+
skillclaude_appclaude_codeclaude_api
git clone https://github.com/anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins && cp -r knowledge-work-plugins/customer-support/skills/customer-research ~/.claude/skills/
بحث العملاء
البحث المتعدد المصادر حول سؤال أو موضوع متعلق بالعميل مع نسب المصادر. استخدم هذه الميزة عندما يطرح العميل سؤالا تحتاج للبحث عنه، أو للتحقق مما إذا تم…★ 4.8 · 0+
skillclaude_appclaude_codeclaude_api
git clone https://github.com/anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins && cp -r knowledge-work-plugins/customer-support/skills/kb-article ~/.claude/skills/
مقالة قاعدة المعرفة
مقالة قاعدة المعارف من مشكلة تم حلها أو سؤال شائع. استخدم هذا النموذج عندما يستحق حل التذكرة التوثيق للخدمة الذاتية، أو يتكرر نفس السؤال باستمرار، أو…★ 4.8 · 0+
skillclaude_appclaude_codeclaude_api
git clone https://github.com/anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins && cp -r knowledge-work-plugins/customer-support/skills/draft-response ~/.claude/skills/
مسودة الرد
رد احترافي موجه للعملاء مصمم حسب الوضع والعلاقة. استخدم عند الإجابة على أسئلة المنتج أو التعامل مع التصعيد أو الانقطاع أو إبلاغ أخبار سيئة مثل التأخير…★ 4.8 · 0+
skillclaude_appclaude_codeclaude_api
git clone https://github.com/anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins && cp -r knowledge-work-plugins/customer-support/skills/customer-escalation ~/.claude/skills/
تصعيد العملاء
حزم التصعيد لفريق الهندسة أو المنتج أو الإدارة مع السياق الكامل. استخدم هذا عند الحاجة إلى اهتمام الهندسة خارج نطاق الدعم العادي، أو عند إبلاغ عملاء م…★ 4.8 · 0+

افحص قبل التثبيت

شغل أي مصدر عبر فحوصاتنا - الظهور في الذكاء الاصطناعي والأمان والأداء واكتشاف التقنيات.

المزيد في خدمة العملاء