skill

Systematic Debugging

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes

obra276,133+ installsVetted

About

# Systematic Debugging

## Overview

**Core principle:** ALWAYS find root cause before attempting fixes. Symptom fixes are failure.

**Violating the letter of this process is violating the spirit of debugging.**

## The Iron Law

``` NO FIXES WITHOUT ROOT CAUSE INVESTIGATION FIRST ```

If you haven't completed Phase 1, you cannot propose fixes.

## When to Use

Use for ANY technical issue: - Test failures - Bugs in production - Unexpected behavior - Performance problems - Build failures - Integration issues

**Use this ESPECIALLY when:** - Under time pressure (emergencies make guessing tempting) - "Just one quick fix" seems obvious - You've already tried multiple fixes - Previous fix didn't work - You don't fully understand the issue

**Don't skip when:** - Issue seems simple (simple bugs have root causes too) - You're in a hurry (rushing guarantees rework) - Manager wants it fixed NOW (systematic is faster than thrashing)

## The Four Phases

You MUST complete each phase before proceeding to the next.

### Phase 1: Root Cause Investigation

**BEFORE attempting ANY fix:**

1. **Read Error Messages Carefully** - Don't skip past errors or warnings - They often contain the exact solution - Read stack traces completely - Note line numbers, file paths, error codes

2. **Reproduce Consistently** - Can you trigger it reliably? - What are the exact steps? - Does it happen every time? - If not reproducible → gather more data, don't guess

3. **Check Recent Changes** - What changed that could cause this? - Git diff, recent commits - New dependencies, config changes - Environmental differences

4. **Gather Evidence in Multi-Component Systems**

**WHEN system has multiple components (CI → build → signing, API → service → database):**

**BEFORE proposing fixes, add diagnostic instrumentation:** ``` For EACH component boundary: - Log what data enters component - Log what data exits component - Verify environment/config propagation - Check state at each layer

Run once to gather evidence showing WHERE it breaks THEN analyze evidence to identify failing component THEN investigate that specific component ```

**Example (multi-layer system):** ```bash # Layer 1: Workflow echo "=== Secrets available in workflow: ===" echo "IDENTITY: ${IDENTITY:+SET}${IDENTITY:-UNSET}"

# Layer 2: Build script echo "=== Env vars in build script: ===" env | grep IDENTITY || echo "IDENTITY not in environment"

# Layer 3: Signing script echo "=== Keychain state: ===" security list-keychains security find-identity -v

# Layer 4: Actual signing codesign --sign "$IDENTITY" --verbose=4 "$APP" ```

**This reveals:** Which layer fails (secrets → workflow ✓, workflow → build ✗)

5. **Trace Data Flow**

**WHEN error is deep in call stack:**

See `root-cause-tracing.md` in this directory for the complete backward tracing technique.

**Quick version:** - Where does bad value originate? - What called this with bad value? - Keep tracing up until you find the source - Fix at source, not at symptom

### Phase 2: Pattern Analysis

**Find the pattern before fixing:**

1. **Find Working Examples** - Locate similar working code in same codebase - What works that's similar to what's broken?

2. **Compare Against References** - If implementing pattern, read reference implementation COMPLETELY - Don't skim - read every line - Understand the pattern fully before applying

3. **Identify Differences** - What's different between working and broken? - List every difference, however small - Don't assume "that can't matter"

4. **Understand Dependencies** - What other components does this need? - What settings, config, environment? - What assumptions does it make?

### Phase 3: Hypothesis and Testing

**Scientific method:**

1. **Form Single Hypothesis** - State clearly: "I think X is the root cause because Y" - Write it down - Be specific, not vague

2. **Test Minimally** - Make the SMALLEST possible change to test hypothesis - One variable at a time - Don't fix multiple things at once

3. **Verify Before Continuing** - Did it work? Yes → Phase 4 - Didn't work? Form NEW hypothesis - DON'T add more fixes on top

4. **When You Don't Know** - Say "I don't understand X" - Don't pretend to know - Ask for help - Research more

### Phase 4: Implementation

**Fix the root cause, not the symptom:**

1. **Create Failing Test Case** - Simplest possible reproduction - Automated test if possible - One-off test script if no framework - MUST have before fixing - Use the `superpowers:test-driven-development` skill for writing proper failing tests

2. **Implement Single Fix** - Address the root cause identified - ONE change at a time - No "while I'm here" improvements - No bundled refactoring

3. **Verify Fix** - Test passes now? - No othe

Install

Run this command

npx skills add obra/superpowers

Works with

claude appclaude codeclaude apicursorcodexwindsurfclinezed

Manual steps

Install with `npx skills add obra/superpowers`, or clone the repository and copy the `skills/systematic-debugging` folder into your Claude skills directory.

View source

Frequently asked questions

What is the Systematic Debugging skill?

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes

How do I install Systematic Debugging?

Run this in your terminal:

npx skills add obra/superpowers
Which AI tools does Systematic Debugging work with?

It works with claude_app, claude_code, claude_api, cursor, codex, windsurf, cline, zed.

Who made Systematic Debugging?

obra.

Is Systematic Debugging free?

Yes, it is free to use.

Related assets

More curated picks in Development & Code.

All Systematic Debugging alternatives →
skillclaude_appclaude_codeclaude_api
git clone https://github.com/anthropics/skills && cp -r skills/skills/claude-api ~/.claude/skills/
Claude API
Reference for the Claude API / Anthropic SDK — model ids, pricing, params, streaming, tool use, MCP, agents, caching, token counting, model migration.…★ 4.8 · 2,500+
skillclaude_appclaude_codeclaude_api
npx skills add mattpocock/skills
Tdd
Test-driven development. Use when the user wants to build features or fix bugs test-first, mentions "red-green-refactor", or wants integration tests.980,434+
skillclaude_appclaude_codeclaude_api
npx skills add mattpocock/skills
Grilling
Grill the user relentlessly about a plan, decision, or idea. Use when the user wants to stress-test their thinking, or uses any 'grill' trigger phrase…793,522+
skillclaude_appclaude_codeclaude_api
npx skills add mattpocock/skills
Diagnosing Bugs
Diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions. Use when the user says "diagnose"/"debug this", or reports something broken/throwing/failing…678,622+
skillclaude_appclaude_codeclaude_api
npx skills add mattpocock/skills
Code Review
Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes: Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented cod…631,767+
skillclaude_appclaude_codeclaude_api
npx skills add microsoft/azure-skills
Azure Diagnostics
Debug Azure production issues on Azure using AppLens, Azure Monitor, resource health, and safe triage. WHEN: debug production issues, troubleshoot app…608,568+

Audit before you install

Run any source through our checks - AI visibility, security, performance, and stack detection.

More in Development & Code